Search for:
Related companies
Australian Business
Lawyers
International Trade
Marketing
HR
OHS
Management Consulting
Recruitment Solutions
Education
Contact Us
Subscribe
Contact Us
» Call us now 1800 505 529
ABS Group
About us
Chamber membership
Our Team
HR Tools
HR Advance
WorkplaceInfo
Recruitment
Apprenticeships
HR Consultants
Bullying Prevention Pack
Executive Leadership Programs
Mental Health Awareness
People Coaching
Workers Compensation Premiums Pack
News
8 tips to help build your business in FY17
ABLA ALERT: The Tribunal Softens It's Approach to Pornography
HR strategic innovation - one key to transformational leadership
Jim Collins on leadership
Leadership Expectations - 2014 & Beyond
Management v leadership: know the difference for survival
An Innovation Saving Businesses Thousands
Big Data - HR Mindfulness
Bust a move — can you resign by interpretive dance?
Change fatigue? Moving from zombies to the living
How HR can be Innovative
HR Business Partnering - Proactive & Predictive
Redundancy: is pregnancy a special case?
Organisational Behaviours To Support Sustainable Solutions
Is our disciplinary procedure fair?
Never work with children or animals
Rising cyber-crime and why you need strong HR policies
Self-directed learning achieves best results
Sending employees overseas: does long service leave apply?
Strategy: focus on the execution
The cyber bullies are among us: what to do
This conversation is off the record . . . I hope!
What do workers value at work?
The Challenge for HR
Trust HR Advance multi award winning service
Yes, it’s true…14,000 public service jobs lost in Queensland
Social Media – No Policy, No Case
Wages went up on 1 July… do we have to pay the increase now?
Rewarding and recognising staff – it’s not always about money!
The Importance of Policies in the Workplace
When is a casual employee not a casual?
Unreasonable to Dismiss
Tips to deliver a deadly talk....now that's sick!
Home >
HR
>
Unreasonable to Dismiss
Unreasonable to Dismiss
Release Date
26 June 2013
Unreasonable to refuse part-time work after parental leave
An employer refused to allow a woman returning from parental leave to work on a part-time basis. The Fair Work Commission (FWC) found that the woman had been constructively dismissed, that is, her resignation had effectively been forced upon her.
In related news, the Federal Government has announced that the Australian Human Rights Commission will be conducting an inquiry into discrimination around pregnancy at work and return to work after parental leave.
Right to request part-time work
Ms R was employed as an IT administrator and the company had an agreement under which she was employed that provided a right to request to work part-time until the child reached school age. If the company refused such a request, it was to do so on objective business grounds.
Facts did not support employer’s case
In this particular case, the employer made Ms R's return to a part-time position conditional upon its ability to recruit another part-time employee.
On this point, Commissioner Lewin commented:
‘Rather than making Ms R’s return to part time work conditional upon recruitment of another part-time employee, which in my objective judgement was unreasonable, it would have been reasonable to have Ms R return to work for three days a week in late January. If the further resources were required that could have been achieved by subsequent recruitment or contracted services. However, it is clear that the Company has continued to provide part time equivalent performance of Ms R’s role.’
Customer service argued
Customer service issues were put forward by the employer and rejected by the commission:
‘… the refusal of Ms R’s request to work part time would not seem reasonably based in relation to the impact on customer service. The nature of the role would seem to impact on internal customers, presumably with potential consequential effects on the delivery of the Company’s service to its clients. On the evidence, it is not possible to judge that the primary impact on the customers … of Ms R’s request to work part time for three days per week would have been adverse had it been granted in the circumstances, given that Ms R was an experienced employee of the Company and would have provided a greater number of hours of work in the role than was being delivered in a not entirely satisfactory manner by an external service provider …’
Constructive dismissal
The tribunal found that the employer’s refusal of the part-time work request was unreasonable and the applicant had been constructively dismissed.
Pregnancy/parental leave inquiry announced
The Federal Government has just announced that the Australian Human Rights Commission will conduct an inquiry into pregnancy at work and return to work after parental leave.|
‘There is significant anecdotal evidence that women in particular are being demoted, sacked, or having their role or hours unfavourably “re-structured” while on parental leave or on their return from leave. The inquiry will measure the prevalence of this discrimination and help ensure parents, particularly mothers, are treated fairly at work,’ said Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.
Sex Discrimination Commissioner Elizabeth Broderick will oversee a national survey commencing in August 2013 to more accurately assess the prevalence, nature and consequences of discrimination relating to pregnancy at work and return to work after parental leave.
To find out more information regarding dismissal or termination contact us on 1800 505 529 or via
email
Contact Us
Call Us on 1800 505 529
Submit Enquiry